
Royal Optics
In Modern Majesty, Chris Jackson distils a decade of access into a study of how the British monarchy is seen—where tradition meets a faster visual economy.
For more than a decade, Getty Images Royal Photographer Chris Jackson has occupied a vantage point few photographers are afforded: close enough to observe the choreography of the British royal family, yet disciplined enough to wait for the moments that slip past it. Now 46, based in south-west London and a father of two, his path to that position was not entirely preordained. He began studying science before photography—always a parallel preoccupation—asserted itself, leading him to take the plunge with Getty Images some 25 years ago.

His new book, Modern Majesty, published by Rizzoli, reads as both archive and edit—a considered distillation of images that chart not just a lineage, but a recalibration. If monarchy has always depended on image-making, it now operates within a far more accelerated visual economy, where a photograph must hold its own across everything from front pages to algorithmic feeds. Jackson’s pictures suggest a quieter negotiation between access and restraint, tradition and adaptation.
You’ve spent years photographing the royal family. What was the impulse behind shaping that archive into Modern Majesty now?
There’s a sense of transition. I’ve been fortunate to document different generations, and it felt like the right moment to reflect on that continuity—how tradition is maintained and how it evolves. The book is really about that balance.
Royal photography exists somewhere between reportage and ceremony. How do you find something that feels unguarded within such a structured environment?
It’s about observation. Even in very formal settings, there are fleeting moments—interactions, gestures—that reveal something more human. You have to anticipate them, but also be ready to react instantly.
You’ve photographed everyone from Queen Elizabeth II to the younger members of the Wales family. Do you approach those subjects differently?
Each generation has its own rhythm. With Her Majesty, there was an extraordinary consistency—she understood the power of an image instinctively. With the younger royals, there’s perhaps a greater informality, but the awareness of being photographed is still very much there.

What separates an “official” image from one that lingers?
Often it’s something small—a glance, a moment of connection, an unexpected detail. Those are the images people return to, because they feel less like documentation and more like a glimpse behind it.
Access is clearly central to your work. How is that trust built over time?
It comes from being consistent and professional, and from understanding the environment you’re working in. You’re there to do a job, but also to respect the context. Over time, that familiarity helps.
Do you ever decide not to take a photograph?
Yes. Some moments feel too private, or where taking the picture would disrupt what’s happening. Knowing when to step back is just as important as knowing when to press the shutter.

The book’s title suggests a reframing of monarchy for a contemporary audience. What does “modern” mean in this context?
It’s about relevance. The monarchy has to connect with people today, and imagery plays a huge role in that. The challenge is to do that without losing the sense of history that defines it.
When you look at your own archive, do you think in terms of individual images or a larger narrative?
Definitely the narrative. Any one photograph can be strong, but it’s the accumulation over time that tells the real story.

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Recommended for you
A New Chapter at Spicers—And a Restaurant Worth the Drive
At Spicers Vineyards Estate, a renewed Restaurant Botanica shifts the focus from the room to the table—and rewards the drive.
April 15, 2026
About Last Night: Cartagena on Crown Street
Alquímico touched down at El Primo Sanchez for a single, high-voltage service—but the drinks linger.
April 17, 2026











Courtesy of Patricks



