
Why Diners—and Chefs—Are Turning Away From the Michelin Guide
After a recent spate of misplaced stars, fine-dining lovers from Sydney to Singapore are looking elsewhere for reliable restaurant recommendations.
BEFORE A RECENT TRIP TO Hong Kong, I did what many travellers do: I googled the local Michelin Guide ratings and booked a three-star table. The menu proclaimed exceptional Cantonese, but what I got left me unimpressed. The right dishes were there, but the quality and service I expected were not. The food was curiously bland, oily, rote—and the waitstaff were so indifferent that I had to beg for my wine glass to be refilled. I’ve had better meals in linoleum-floor joints in Chinatown.
So, how had this place managed to earn one of fine dining’s top designations? When I quizzed colleagues in the city, they admitted that the restaurant’s decline was an open secret. Its recurring stars were a subject of industry speculation.
But my disappointment in Hong Kong isn’t an isolated case. The Michelin Guide’s lauding of lacklustre restaurants has become so prevalent that experienced diners, bewildered to see stellar performers lose ratings or get excluded altogether—the gradual demotion of Daniel Boulud’s eponymous New York restaurant from three stars to one is a particular scene bugbear—have begun to turn elsewhere for solid suggestions.
The food was bland and oily—I had to beg for my wineglass to be refilled.
For a certain class of foodie, the Guide no longer has “the influence, power or cachet that it used to,” says Michael Lawrence, the former director of operations for Boulud’s Dinex Group, who is now lifestyle manager at Harry Macklowe’s luxury condo tower One Wall Street.
Day in and day out, he books tables for residents in the canteens of the crème de la crème—Le Bilboquet, The Polo Bar or Cipriani—restaurants that don’t have stars and never courted the Guide to begin with. But when diners do want to give their taste buds a thrill, they consult their friends, another trusted concierge or their favourite mâitre d’—not Michelin.
“If you are a regular in one of the high-end restaurants, you learn about new restaurants from the staff. And that includes general managers and chefs. It’s word of mouth,” Lawrence says. “That’s really how it works.”
But if diners are disappointed with the Guide’s misfires, the cooks themselves are furious.
In January, French chef Marc Veyrat announced that Michelin inspectors will be prohibited from entering his new eponymous eatery in the alpine village of Megève, where you can dine for the equivalent of around $740 a head. “I don’t want to be in [the Michelin Guide], and I am prepared to put up a sign outside [saying]: ‘Michelin Guide banned’,” he told Le Parisien.
At least some portion of that disdain stems from the harsh reality that inclusion in the Guide no longer assures the spoils the honour once conferred.
“I’ve been on both sides,” says a prominent chef and restaurateur who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation. “I have retained a star and gone through that pressure. I’ve gone through not having a star and not having that pressure. To be honest with you, it made zero difference to my business.”
The benefit of this shift away from the Guide’s mercurial standards is that it separates the wheat from the chaff. If diners need the imprimatur of a star rating to inspire curiosity about a restaurant, it might be a signal that they don’t know their asparagus tongs from their marrow scoops.
“There’s two audiences [for fine dining]: finance bros who follow where their peers go—and certainly they don’t care about Michelin stars,” says author and wine columnist Jay McInerney. And then, he adds, “there are people who genuinely care about the food and who debate each other about whether the last meal was as good as the one before it.”
For real connoisseurs, such good taste is its own reward. As the Guide continues to overload its award-winning restaurants with a glut of booking requests, less-formal networks are promoting truly great dining rooms for those in the know.
And while buying hard-to-get reservations is prevalent in hubs such as Paris, Singapore and London—as well as some Sydney and Melbourne venues—the practice marks the diners who pay for access as outsiders.
As Lawrence puts it, “It’s people who don’t know anybody and are trying to impress a client.”
Photo credits top: Illustrated by Antonio Sortino
Subscribe to the Newsletter
Recommended for you
Switzerland’s Gstaad Palace Just Gave Its Largest Restaurant an Opulent Makeover
The 112-year-old hotel’s Le Grand gives guests exactly what they want—even if it’s off-menu.
By Tori Latham
January 19, 2026
The South African Winery Making World-Class Cabernet Sauvignon
Capensis is unlocking the potential of the king of red grapes in Stellenbosch.
By Mike Desimone And Jeff Jenssen
January 19, 2026















































